Showing posts with label Avoid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Avoid. Show all posts

Sunday, 14 August 2011

The Five Myths That Slow Down Sales and How to Avoid Them


Time is money, yeah, yeah, we've heard that before. But if time really is money, why do so many professionals squander it chasing anyone with a pulse, including their most horrible prospects? Because they still embrace one of the great myths of selling, common mistakes that drain profit and energy from a sales organization:

Myth #1: Everybody is our customer.

Myth #2: Every sale is a good sale.

Myth #3: Never take no for an answer.

Myth #4: There's always time to make more sales calls.

Myth #5: Sales people pay for themselves.

Business people the world over know these statements are myths, but behave as if they aren't. Why? It's because the great selling myths are so familiar that they have become invisible. To uproot them, we must create effective ways to replace them with more adaptive, successful practices, and turn those practices into habits. Changing habits is hard.

In the case of the Five Selling Myths, these old habits are ingrained in decades of selling tradition, enshrined in company policy, and even taught by well-intentioned people who might be a little bit behind the times. Replace each of the Five Myths with the Five MythBusters, new approaches to the issues that create better outcomes. Selling is about money - making it, but also spending it. If you knew the real cost of one hour of selling time, you might invest those hours more carefully.

Studies have shown that the average sales person only has about 900 hours (about 100 days) of face-to-face selling time per year, once you take away weekends, holidays, vacations, sick time, and record-keeping. To reach a $1 million dollar quota, each of those 900 hours is worth a whopping $1,111. When the Five Myths rule the sales process, a lot of those expensive hours get wasted. Keep that opportunity cost in mind as you review the Five Myths.

Myth #1: Everybody is our customer. In spite of the thousands of words that have been written about this subject, we still find sales people and executives who don't define their target markets or prospects very well. The awful truth is that when you act as if "anybody" is your prospect, you are throwing money down the drain. You're spending $1,000 an hour to chase marginal prospects, because it feels better to be busy. But to what end?

Mythbuster #1: The right prospects seek the value you add. Selling is simple, really. Find out what you do well, and offer it to people who want it. Replacing the 'anybody who'll buy from me' practice requires some effort on your part. Analyze the things you do particularly well, including your product, service, and personal charm. Then go back over your list of existing customers, asking what you liked about them, and what they liked about you. Write down the pertinent information. And use it as your qualifying 'script' - learn to ask penetrating questions, early in the relationship, that reveal the potential for this prospect to become one of your best customers. At BSG, one of the tools we give clients is The SMART Way Prospect Scorecard(TM), a digital scoring matrix that grades your prospect based on how likely they are to become profitable, long-term customers.

Myth #2: Every sale is a good sale. As obvious as it may seem, this particular myth persists in many businesses. If business is slow, if you've got unused capacity or labor sitting around idle, it's all too tempting to accept any business that walks in the door. But is every sale worth it? Not if it's unprofitable or damaging to your reputation.

Mythbuster #2: Good sales bring profit to the seller and satisfaction to the buyer. Now that you have a definition of your ideal customer, add the definition of a 'good sale.' Write down the margin you have to earn to achieve basic profitability, and don't violate it. Add other characteristics that define the 'good' sale, such as evidence of customer satisfaction. Praise sales people when they decline business that is unprofitable or likely to disappoint the customer's expectations. A component of your Prospect Scorecard should be the likelihood that any given sale represents a tangible exchange of value between buyer and seller, and is just as good for you as it is for the customer.

Myth #3: Never take NO for an answer. This myth is one of the most difficult to identify and therefore to uproot. After all, our society prizes this attitude; we build monuments to it. But think about it. Refusing to take "No" goes hand in hand with 'everybody is our customer' and 'every sale is a good sale.' Always remember that a sale is not a one-way transaction. If it isn't right for one of the parties, then it is probably wrong for both.

Mythbuster #3: Don't beat a dead horse. Adopt an analytical attitude. Qualify each prospect, and each opportunity, carefully, to learn if the deal is in fact going to be (a) profitable and (b) satisfying to the customer. Assess the investment costs of continued sales effort, always remembering that your selling time is probably worth $1,000 an hour or more. At some point, the deal passes the point of diminishing returns. Guide your sales people to a more effective use of their time.

Myth #4: There's always time to make more sales calls. This myth comes into play when the sales team is focused on activity instead of results. But it's a dangerous practice. First of all, there isn't much more time left to make sales calls. If the average sales person has only 100 days (900 hours) of selling time in a year, or less, where is that time going to come from - sleep, sick time, vacations, administration? When sales people go after the wrong prospects, pursue unprofitable projects, or waste time on unproductive activities, then more sales calls may not equal more sales.

Mythbuster #4: Make scarce sales time count. The best way to dismantle this belief is to reinforce the investment value of sales time. Remember the investment value of one hour of selling time - $1,111? Now add up the cost of an hour of nose-to-nose time, plus travel time, gas, tolls, parking, literature, coffee, lunch. Now the cost of that sales call is somewhere north of $1200 and rising. What would happen if your sales people had to requisition that money in cash, every time they went out on a call? They would get very discriminating about the way they invested their time.

Myth #5: Sales people pay for themselves. It's true that plenty of sales people get paid on straight commission, so it seems as if they can pay their own way. But it's not so simple. Sales people may earn compensation from a share of the profits, but their true costs include impact on customer satisfaction, market presence and awareness, lost opportunity and perhaps other considerations.

Mythbuster #5: They pay for everybody. The Sales department funds the entire business operation. So sales people have to do much more than pay for themselves. They have to pay everybody's salaries, fund R&D, underwrite marketing expenditures, and put enough reserves on the books to justify investments in capital equipment. And they can't do that if they don't have the right support and guidance. Replace Myths with Best Practices Selling is probably the most important contributor to business health, even more important than products and services. It's a difficult art to master. So it pays to develop good mechanisms to support and guide the sales effort.

Here are five Best Practices that help sweep away the myths and make the Five Mythbusters come alive. They are:

1. Create an Ideal Customer Profile. Develop this profile on customers with whom you have had success in the past. Detail not only the facts (demographics, company size, annual revenues, SIC codes), but the qualitative characteristics as well, those elements that represent the value they seek when doing business with your company. If you really want a powerful profile, use the SMART Way Prospect Scorecard.

2. Set Clear Expectations. Give your sales people clear and quantifiable performance expectations for all stages of the sales process. Don't simply throw a quota and a territory map at them. Tell them you expect them to convert so many leads to suspects, suspects to prospects, prospects to contracts, contracts to repeat business. And follow up with them.

3. Track Performance and Share the Data. Stop managing your sales force by anecdote, those traditional sales meetings where each sales person fills up time telling about why this or that deal hasn't closed yet. Instead focus on collective performance against those expectations you laid out above. Build sales meetings around a review of the data. Now you're dealing with facts.

4. Work on the Process to Improve Results. If sales are down this month, don't panic. Instead, examine the underlying processes to see where the slowdown occurred and why. Maybe sales are down because there's an operational glitch, or an unexpected trend in the local market.

5. Give Great Support. Everybody likes nice bosses better than mean bosses, but great sales support means more than that. It means removing obstacles to performance wherever possible, smoothing the way, and leaving people alone when that's appropriate. Go over your selling process to see if you can spot any of the Five Myths at work. If you find them, replace them with better practices. Now you are on your way to achieving great sales performance, and sustaining it.




Ellen Bristol is the founder and driving force behind Bristol Strategy Group, the Miami-based sales-force productivity company, and developer of Selling the SMART Way®, BSG's flagship solution for productive sales teams. BSG's latest offering is the SMART Way® Alert System, web-hosted toolkit for managing sales-force productivity. Visit the BSG website http://www.bristolstrategygroup.com, email her at ellen@bristolstrategygroup.com or phone 305-935-6676.





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

One Sales "Moment Of Truth" You Want To Avoid Is A Hang-Up


In sales, there are plenty moments of truth. Unfortunately, most of these moments do not happen after closing a big sale or great accomplishment. They usually come after a prospect has slammed the phone receiver in your ear. And more often than not, that nasty moment of truth is not the result of a bad salesperson but a deficiency in the sales process. Bad sales management systems are a prime culprit, and probably lead to more confusion among sales people and over-contacted customers than any other sales process technology.

Having an unorganized sales process and more than one salesperson calling the same prospect is the moment you probably lost the sale. In sales, there is no excuse for a disorganized database sales program. Every organization, from a small business with two salespeople to a big enterprise, can afford to have sales process management software in place so that no target is being called more times than necessary.

Although there is no excuse for having a deficient database, it happens easily, and it happens frequently. Let's say, hypothetically, that a company has five salespeople and they are each responsible for calling the businesses listed in their territory for payments and sales. Unfortunately, there is no feature in their sales management system that displays when a prospect was contacted.

On Monday, Joe decides to call Roxy's House of Nails but has no place in the contact record to enter when or who he called. On Wednesday, another salesperson is looking through the database and calls Roxy's for the second time. Now, Roxy is starting to get angry because she keeps getting sales calls from the same organization. On Thursday, Wendy makes the unfortunate decision to call Roxy's. Poor Wendy gets an earful from Roxy, who screams that she will never buy another item from the company again. For emphasis, she slams the phone receiver in Wendy's ear. That is a sales moment of truth.

The BBB's Problem

A real life example of a company that has solved this problem is the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston. With a disorganized system, the Better Business Bureau was notorious for making multiple calls to the same prospect. With a list of more than 200,000 local businesses, Juan Ortega, regional sales manager, needed a more efficient method to manage lead processing and membership list development. He needed a system that would help build a better sales process and enable the internal sales team to focus on moving leads through the sales process.

Because the Houston Better Business Bureau is a nonprofit organization and is funded by dues from member companies, it focuses on selling its mission. Once a company is contacted, the general rule is to wait 90 days before making contact again. Unfortunately, with no formal sales management system in place, multiple sales reps were calling the same organization time and time again, leading to frustrated prospects and a high employee turnover rate (and more repeat calls by the replacement telemarketers).

After some initial research, Ortega found a sales management system that not only allowed him to track his sales team's activities but also allowed him to import thousands of pre-screened leads into the system and choose the best prospects for his team. The result was a shortened sales process. Generally one call equals one close. The team also had fewer angry prospects and converted more leads to customers.

"Before we had our sales management system in place, I couldn't control which sales rep was calling what company," said Ortega. "Now I know who called what company, when they called, and what was said. I can effectively track leads and broaden our outreach to more promising industries."

Consistence

Ortega said the sales reps have become more consistent in their sales efforts. "The performance bar has been raised," he said. "After implementing the software, 75 percent of our sales team is now producing at the bonus level."

After a year of implementing the software, Ortega has a fast and efficient sales tool that has led the Houston Better Business Bureau to record months of membership growth. What was once an unorganized sales process plagued by a high employee turnover rate and low morale is now a proficient sales group propelling the organization to record growth.

Take advantage of a sales management system. It's easy and affordable and, if used correctly, can boost sales and create a happier and more productive sales team. Who wants to work for a company where you get constantly yelled at by prospects for calling too many times?

Research your options and choose software that fits your company's needs. Do not allow the technology to be complicated or become part of the problem. Most sales management systems come with some type of training. Using a hosted system is even easier. It is easy to install and is affordable.

Installing the software is only half of the battle. Establish sales policies in your company. Make it mandatory for every sales rep to use the system. Although you might get resistance from a few members of your sales team who do not welcome change, making a sales management system a mandate will keep your sales efforts organized and easy to manage.

There is no excuse for weak or incapable management of sales information or overcalling potential targets. Use a sales management system and save your team members the indignity of having prospects yell at them and, worse, slam phones down on them. If you decide to take my advice, you will never have to endure this particularly distasteful sales moment of truth. Trust me, it's not pretty, and there is always the possibility of going deaf.




Geary Broadnax, president and chief executive officer of Dovarri, Inc., is a recognized expert in the development of hosted sales force automation and customer relationship management software, and an award winning photographer. He is a frequent contributor to Steven Kay [http://www.stevenkay.anythinginternet.com]'s business radio show in Houston, Texas.





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 14 July 2011

Grant Writing - Not Reviewing the Literature - Mistake 2 of 7 to Avoid When Approaching Funders


Federal government agencies, foundations and corporations get turned off by grant proposals that:


Are off-topic;
Have been tried elsewhere;
Give a negative tone;
Come from an applicant, not a client perspective;
Lack adequate infrastructure;
Include lots of unsupported assumptions; and
Look for quick fixes. In this article, you will learn mistake 2 of 7 to avoid when approaching funders: not reviewing the literature. Failure to find out if your project or idea has been tried elsewhere could lead to your rejection. The solution is here, too, so you don't make this mistake in the future.

Most of the time, our ideas are not new. In fact, one researchaer (Meador 1985) found that as many as one-third of all proposals submitted to a funder who was seeking innovative ideas were for projects that had been tried elsewhere.

If the idea for which you seek funding is indeed unique, great. If you're anything like most of my students, after reviewing the literature - offline and online - they realize that they are not alone in the universe. In fact, many find programs doing almost exactly what they want to do someplace else.

Solution

Economically, it is far more efficient and far-reaching to build on what has been done successfully than starting from scratch. Surprisingly, you can still make your idea unique, even if it has been tried elsewhere.

To make your idea unique when tried before, here are six steps to reviewing the literature and avoiding this mistake:


Search online - Search on the Internet using keywords that best represent your idea or program, like child care, child development, daycare, early childhood, preschool.
Search offline - Identify professional associations in your industry, such as the National Association for the Education of Young Children, Association for Childhood Education International. Review their journals and websites.
Identify 1-3 programs doing what you want to do, like Montessori.
Interview the director of each program.
Summarize in 1-3 paragraphs what each program has already accomplished, methodologies used, failings, successes, stumbling blocks.
Include this summary in the "methods" section of your proposal. Then, leverage your proposal in a way that builds on the successes of the other programs.
Subtle improvement of what works is easier, faster and more fundable than starting from scratch. In the eyes of the funder, building on a review and summary of the literature - online and offline - will demonstrate that you've done your homework.




And now I would like to invite you to claim your free subscription to the Grant Writing Newsletter when you visit http://GrantWritingNewsletter.com.

From Phil Johncock - The Grant Writing Professor





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.