Mark has just finished his day interviewing his 20th potential sales recruit of the day. Being the Sales Director of the company, he is also responsible to make the final round of interviews of the shortlisted candidates to make sure only the "high-potentials" are being hired.
Being the Sales Director, Mark has a lot of other things to do besides interviewing sales candidates. However, due to the extremely high sales staff turnover, Mark has been getting a lot more involved in the sales staff hiring process, sometimes getting involved even in the preliminary interviews.
Still, despite his best efforts to make sure only the sales people with the relevant experience, the best track records and whom had made the most impressive impression during the sales interviews are hired. 6 months later, most if not all sales hires have failed to deliver according to expectations.
When Mark asked his Sales Managers why the new sales hires are not performing, the answers somehow centre around the following:
• "These young people are simply not motivated to work hard enough"
• "They just don't have the 'sense' to do business with the customers"
• "They just cannot fit into our kind of business", etc.
Somehow, Mark feels rather helpless as no matter what he did, his new sales hires are just not performing. Now Mark needs to find some ways that will give him some indications of future success, or he might as well implement a hiring freeze since his company has been wasting a lot of resources hiring under-performing sales people.
Mark is not alone in his predicament. Many companies are making a lot hiring mistakes when hiring new sales people. If these mistakes can be rectified, these companies can see significant improvements in their sales results.
The Fallacy of Hiring Experienced Sales People
When most companies hire sales people, the major criteria usually includes having some years of experience selling in the same or a similar industry, and a good track record of good sales results.
However, if you were to look closer, these are not the critical success factors that will determine if the sales person will deliver results for you.
One key reason is that the market place that we are operating in is constantly changing. You will notice that:
• Customers are getting more and more demanding and knowledgeable;
• Competition is getting more and more intense;
• The things you sell are getting more and more complex, etc.
In some markets, the changes within a 5-year period can be so drastic that it's beyond recognition.
So if you are hiring based on past experience, how do you know that what worked in the past is going to work in the future? The same factors that gave you success in the past are getting less and less relevant for today's and the future's challenges.
What about a good sales track record, you might ask. Surely, if a sales person has been consistently producing great results will still continue to produce great results.
Unfortunately, unlike many other professions, the sales profession is one where dealing with failures is essential to becoming a successful sales person. No successful sales person can claim that he or she has never been rejected by customers, or has never lost deals in an ongoing basis. In fact, just like in many negotiations, the better sales person knows when to "walk away" and seek other better prospective customers, while the weaker sales person hangs on too long to customers that are never going to buy.
Hence, if you see sales people who seem to have "perfect" track records in the sense that they always reach or exceed sales targets could be:
• Selling in a monopoly where customers have no choice but to buy from them;
• Entering the market in an early stage so that they got the biggest customers in that market;
• Selling for a well-established brand to loyal existing customers that really need little persuasion to buy
This is not to say that having the relevant experience and a good track record is not important to a sales person. It just means that having some years of sales experience and a track record is no indicator of future performance.
The Critical Behaviours that Drive Sales
While companies are always looking at sales figures to determine the success of their sales force, most of the time it is the sales process (i.e. how you sell) that determines the results you get. How well the sales process is being executed depends largely the habits and behaviours of each sales person.
Different companies will have different sales processes for different customers in different regions who are buying different product lines. Hence, the critical behaviours that drive sales success will vary from case to case. The sales processes that companies have can include:
1. Selling only to a few Strategic Accounts, and sales people will have to work through complex relationships so as to gain buy-in from all levels in the customer's organisation;
2. Constantly generating new leads and getting new customers to buy frequently; or
3. Having a balance of new business development and key accounts management so that sales people are getting both new and existing customers to buy from them with varying complexity, etc.
In reality, sales processes can get a lot more complicated as different customers in different markets have different needs that have to be satisfied in different ways. So what if you aren't quite sure what is the sales process for the next sales person, here are some "generic" critical behaviours that apply to most sales processes (and which are found lacking in most sales people too):
• Constant prospecting to make sure the sales person fills up the pipeline. Most sales people, no matter how experienced, will prefer to deal with existing customers than to look for new ones. However, if the sales person shows the disciplined behaviour to keep on prospecting for new prospects, that is a sign of a good hire;
• Constantly exploring what are the customers' "pain" or problem areas, and pro-actively seeking to provide solutions or suggestions to customers to help them overcome those challenges;
• Making sure that the relationship with the customer are developed with all major key influencers in the customer's organisations, rather than relying on one single contact. Such sales people are also usually good developing relationships with less influential "informants" who can provide critical information
• Learning from mistakes and customer rejections so as to do better next time. In a similar vein, knowing when NOT to pursue a customer when it's not worth the time or effort, AND spend time looking for new and better customers instead, etc.
Hence, during your interviews with candidates, you can ask the following questions:
• "If I were a prospective customer, and you want to do business with me, how would you go about making that first contact?" (Do a role play, and also ask the candidate what is his usual modus operandi)
• "What makes your customers buy from you instead of anybody else? Why have some other customers chosen NOT to buy from you?" (Note: if the candidate gives general answers like "because I provide good service", probe in deeper by asking "what is good service")
• "Typically, how many people do you have to communicate with before you can get your sale? Can you cite an example where you need to work through many contacts before getting the sale?" (Get the candidate to draw his customer's organisation chart if need be)
• "Are there any instances that you thought you probably have won the sale, but somehow lost it in the end? What do you think you can learn from such cases?" (Beware the candidate who's very confident and tells you he knows his customer real well)
• "Are there times when you need to give up on a specific sale? What happened and what did you do then?" (Watch out for the candidate who claims "I never give up any sale!" It is a sign of poor priority management and qualifying skills)
Developing Competent Sales People
It may not be surprising that most if not all of your candidates fail in ALL of the above questions. It could well possible that even some of your existing experienced sales people fail some of those questions too. (Or else sales consultancies like us will be out of business very soon!)
The next question will be: if we then set such high standards that no candidates actually display the required critical behaviours, does that mean we don't hire anyone?
The good news is that such critical sales behaviours can be taught and learnt. In fact, high-performing sales people learnt to become high-performers throughout their careers. Only a handful few high-performers are "naturals".
Hence, while most candidates are unlikely to display the critical behaviours that will drive sales for you, you can pick those who display some of those behaviours, AND are willing to learn some new ways to make more sales, you then may have a winner in the near future.
Some companies are unwilling to invest time, effort and money to develop their new sales hires because of the following reasons:
1. "We expect the new sales hire to perform immediately, that's why we hire them for their experience!";
2. "We don't have the time and resources to hand-hold these sales people who can't perform";
3. "If we teach them too much, they may turn around and work for our competitors."
What these companies have to realise is that if they could hire the sales people who can produce immediate results, and don't need any form of training or coaching, that's great. However, such sales people are rare, and those few who are available will probably ask for a very high pay package. In any case, since prior experience and track records are never guarantee of success, companies might just have to train and develop their new sales hires so that they form critical sales habits and behaviours.
by c.j. Ng
c.j. is the trusted sales advisor who have helped international companies achieve quantum improvements in sales profits in China and beyond. He is also the 1st-ever sales trainer and consltant to speak at the American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) International Convention. So far, c.j. has helped:
* A leading international hotel to produce the equivalent of an additional 5,000 room nights in China in the lull summer months of 2007
* A global leading architectural hardware company to increase the sales revenue of a key account in Shanghai by 10 times within 3 weeks
* The world leader in PC sales to transform their sales force to be more collaborative and solution-focused, and helping them to regain worldwide pole position from their nearest competitor.
Prior to this, c.j. was Asia Marketing Manager for a Fortune 500 logistics company, as well as Corporate Training Manager for Ringier AG, Switzerland's largest media group, in China, where he was responsible for sales team development, and helped increase the percentage of new hires to close their first sales within 2 months by 30%, as well as increase overall sales targets by more than 50%. Visit http://www.psycheselling.com/page4.html for more details.
This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
Subscribe to RSS Ubergizmo ReviewsMobileGamingAndroidAppleComputersGadgetsConceptsPhoto/VideoEvents | Jobs Home > Apple > Samsung to start getting aggressive with Apple Samsung to start getting aggressive with Apple Tyler Lee 09/23/2011 08:32 PDT 
If you’ve been following the saga of Apple vs Samsung, it would appear that so far Apple has been the one throwing punches while Samsung sits there and takes them, appealing injunction after the other. All things considered, from an outsider’s perspective it does make Apple look like a bully, but it looks like Samsung has had enough and plans to get aggressive.
YouTube co-founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley picked up social bookmarking site Delicious some time earlier this April on the cheap when Yahoo! placed it up for sale, and according to the both of them in a New York Times interview, they fully intend to “mainstream the product” in order to tug at the heartstrings of people so that many others will be moved to save as well as tag Web sites.